Which prop firm matches your constraints

The selector applies your constraints to the prop firms we track and shows three lists rather than two: those that meet every criterion, those that meet them but publish nothing about your country, and the number that were ruled out. A firm silent on a country is never counted as accepting, because that silence is exactly what you need to go and ask about.

Updated 15 September 2026

Firms kept

14 firms out of 14 meet these conditions.

Prop firmEntrySplitSizes
Elite Trader Funding$197100 %25K, 50K, 100K
Apex Trader FundingNot disclosed100 %50K, 100K, 150K
Topstep$4990 %50K, 100K, 150K
Alpha Futures$7990 %25K, 50K, 100K, 150K
Bulenox$9490 %25K, 50K, 100K, 150K
TradeDay$10090 %25K, 50K, 100K, 150K
Tradeify$11190 %50K, 150K
FTMO Futures$11990 %50K, 100K, 150K
My Funded Futures$12590 %50K
Lucid Trading$13090 %25K, 50K, 100K, 150K
Goat Funded Futures$6980 %50K, 100K, 150K
Phidias Propfirm$11680 %25K, 50K, 100K, 150K
Earn2Trade$15080 %25K, 50K
Take Profit Trader$17080 %25K, 50K, 150K

No firm ruled out.

These calculations project the values you enter. They do not predict your performance and are not investment advice.

What the filter works on

Every question maps to a verified field on the records, never to a judgement. The market comes from the list the firm declares, the account sizes from its active programmes, the budget is compared with the lowest entry price actually published, the platform comes from the compatibility matrix, the drawdown type from the programmes themselves. None of these fields is estimated: when a firm does not publish a price, it is not slotted into a plausible budget band, it leaves the budget filter.

The three lists

An ordinary selector answers yes or no. This one answers with three lists, because the underlying data has three states. A firm in the first list meets your criteria and explicitly accepts your country. A firm in the second meets your criteria but says nothing about your country: that is neither a refusal nor an acceptance, it is a question to ask before you pay. A firm that is ruled out contradicts at least one criterion, or explicitly refuses your country. Counting the second list separately avoids the most common error in this sector, which is presenting silence as agreement.

Country is the decisive criterion

It is the field that rules out the most firms, and it is also the worst documented. Acceptance often depends on the payment method, the identity verification provider and the nationality declared, three things that change without notice. For every firm and country pair the site keeps the source and the verification date, and shows an acceptance only where the firm writes it down. If your country is not in the list, it is not covered yet, and the selector still holds for every other criterion.

After the filter

The resulting list is not a ranking. It is sorted by profit split and then by entry price, which suits most readers without replacing a proper read of the records: two firms on the same split can differ on the first payout delay, the consistency rule, or the platform included in the offer. The glossary explains each of those terms, and the head to head comparisons put the three or four remaining names side by side.

Frequently asked questions

Why does a firm appear in the second list rather than the first?

Because it meets all your criteria but publishes nothing about your country of residence. The site never turns silence into acceptance: the firm is listed separately, with an explicit note that you need to ask.

Does the selector rank firms?

No. It filters, then sorts by profit split and entry price. The per-criterion rankings and the head to head comparisons are what separate the handful of names left.

What happens if a firm does not publish its price?

It drops out as soon as you set a budget, because there is nothing to compare. With no budget entered it stays in the list, marked as not disclosed.

Expected value calculatorChallenge simulatorGlossaryMethodology