Best prop firms, no consistency rule (3, updated 20 Sept 2026)
3 prop firms we track meet the “no consistency rule” criterion. Leading: Phidias Propfirm, Apex Trader Funding and Elite Trader Funding. The ranking uses only hand-checked fields: price read off the firm's site, stated profit split, drawdown type, first payout delay, platforms available. No subjective score enters the order. Updated 20 September 2026.
Updated 20 September 2026What this criterion means
A consistency rule caps the share a single day may take in the total profit, usually between 20 and 50%. It rules out passing an evaluation on one trade, and so forces the result to be spread over several sessions. Only firms whose active programmes carry none are listed.
| Prop firm | Cheapest account | Profit split | Drawdown | Payout | Platforms | Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phidias PropfirmFutures | 25K · $44 | 80% | static or trailing (your choice) | on demand | 3 · 3 included | OFF | Visit |
| Apex Trader FundingFutures | Price not published | 100% | intraday trailing / EOD trailing | up to weekly | 2 | Direct link | Visit |
| Elite Trader FundingFutures | Price not published | 100% | intraday trailing / EOD trailing / static | per cycle | 9 | Direct link | Visit |
Why this ranking
One line per firm, drawn from the same fields as the table: no opinion, only what the data says about the “no consistency rule” criterion.
1.Phidias Propfirm
None of Phidias Propfirm's 4 programmes imposes a consistency rule: one very good day does not block the pass. Entry at $44 on a 25K account, split up to 80%.
2.Apex Trader Funding
None of Apex Trader Funding's 5 programmes imposes a consistency rule: one very good day does not block the pass. Entry at Price not published on a — account, split up to 100%.
3.Elite Trader Funding
None of Elite Trader Funding's 5 programmes imposes a consistency rule: one very good day does not block the pass. Entry at Price not published on a — account, split up to 100%.
“no consistency rule” prop firms: frequently asked questions
Which prop firm leads on the “no consistency rule” criterion?
Phidias Propfirm leads the 3 prop firms ranked on this criterion, based on fields checked as of 20 September 2026. The table above is sortable: the default order follows the criterion, not an editorial preference.
How is this ranking built?
Only from typed fields in our database: price read off the firm's site, stated profit split, drawdown type, maximum daily loss, first payout delay, number of platforms. A firm with missing data is left out rather than ranked at random. Criterion used here: {criterion}.
How many of these prop firms have a verified discount code?
1 of the 3 prop firms in this ranking have a verified code today. For the others, the link on this page goes straight to the official site, with no code.