Discount codes

Best prop firms, 16 rankings by criterion

16 prop firm rankings are published, one per selection criterion. The largest is “for futures”, met by 13 tracked firms. Each ranking first says what its criterion covers, then orders the qualifying firms on a published figure, never on an opinion.

Prop firm rankings

Each row leads to a full ranking, with its table, its explanation and its sources.

Why this ranking

A criterion becomes a ranking on two conditions. It must be readable from a typed column of the database, and therefore checkable row by row against the official page the value came from, and it must gather at least three qualifying firms, without which it is not a ranking. A silence is never counted as an answer: a firm that publishes nothing about trading through news releases does not appear in the ranking of firms that allow it. That is why some criteria the industry pushes hardest, accepted payment methods first among them, have no page yet: too few firms publish them for a comparison to be honest.

What this criterion means

For futures
A futures account gives access to CME, Eurex or ICE contracts, with risk expressed in ticks rather than lots and hours tied to the US session. Listed here are the firms that document futures as a covered market; the order follows the published entry price.
No time limit
An evaluation with no time limit can be passed in one month or in six. What it mainly changes is the risk profile: with no countdown, nothing forces a trade to reach the target before a deadline. Only firms whose active programs all run without a duration cap are listed.
End-of-day drawdown
A drawdown computed at the end of the session looks only at the closing balance: a position that dives during the day and recovers does not count against the floor. It is the most forgiving variant for anyone holding positions for hours. Firms offering it on at least one programme are listed.
Cheapest 50K account
The 50,000 account is the sector's reference size: large enough for the drawdown to leave room to manoeuvre, small enough for the entry price to stay affordable. The ranking compares the public 50K price before any discount, which keeps the rows comparable.
Profit split of 90% and above
The profit split is the share of simulated profits paid to the trader. Above 90%, the gap between two firms turns less on the percentage than on payout frequency, the minimum amount that can be requested and the conditions for getting there.
Large accounts, 150K and up
An account of 150,000 dollars or more changes what matters: the drawdown in absolute terms gets wider, but the payout cap and the consistency rule decide the real pace. The ranking lists firms offering one, ordered on the published price of that bracket.
No activation fee
Many firms add an activation fee at the moment the funded account opens, after the evaluation is passed: the advertised price is then not the total cost. Firms offering at least one plan whose activation fee is explicitly zero are listed.
No daily loss limit
A maximum daily loss stops the day at a given amount, independently of the overall drawdown. Its absence leaves room for a hard session without ending the evaluation, at the cost of discipline resting entirely on the trader. Only firms whose active programs all run without one are listed.
Small accounts, 25K and under
An account of 25,000 dollars or less is there to test a firm's rules without committing much, before sizing up. The ranking lists firms offering one, ordered on the published price of that bracket rather than on their entry price across all sizes, which would answer a different question.
News trading allowed
Most prop firms forbid or restrict positions around macroeconomic releases, because a price gap there runs straight through stop orders. Only firms that explicitly allow it on at least one programme are listed: a firm that says nothing is not counted as permissive, its silence stays a silence.
One-time payment, no subscription
An evaluation billed monthly keeps costing for as long as it lasts, which turns a slow failure into an open-ended expense. A one-time-payment plan fixes the cost at purchase. Firms offering at least one such plan with a published price are listed.
Fastest payouts
The figure shown is the delay before a first payout can be requested after moving to a funded account, as the firm states it. It does not cover bank processing, which is added on top and varies by payment method. A firm that does not publish this delay is not ranked here.
No minimum trading days
A minimum number of trading days forces you to stay in the market for a set number of sessions, even when the target is hit on day one. That is a calendar constraint rather than a risk one, and it mechanically lengthens exposure. Only firms that impose none on any programme are listed.
Intraday drawdown
An intraday drawdown follows the session high, often including unrealised profit: the floor rises while the position is in profit and stays there when it turns. It is the harshest variant, and the one many traders discover after the fact. Firms applying it on at least one programme are listed.
Static drawdown
A static drawdown fixes the loss threshold once and for all, on the starting balance. A trailing drawdown raises it with gains, so it moves the threshold closer to the price exactly when the account is doing well. Listed are the firms offering static, alone or as the trader's choice.
No consistency rule
A consistency rule caps the share a single day may take in the total profit, usually between 20 and 50%. It rules out passing an evaluation on one trade, and so forces the result to be spread over several sessions. Only firms whose active programmes carry none are listed.

Prop firms compared →Methodology and sources →